Journal of Cosmetic and Regenerative Medicine

(ISSN: 3107-2933) Open Access Journal
Rss Feed:
JCRM 2026, 1(2), 24; doi: 10.65381/jcrm.2026.01010024

Microfocused Ultrasound in Aesthetic Medicine: An Update and Critical Review

1 Everkeen Medical Centre, Hong Kong
2 Madaes Medical Centre, Hong Kong
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 May 2026 / Accepted: 25 May 2026 / Published: 9 Jun 2026
View Full-text Download PDF (335kb)

Abstract

Background: The demand for noninvasive aesthetic procedures has surged, positioning microfocused ultrasound and high-intensity focused ultrasound as foundational modalities for tissue lifting and tightening. While early literature established its basic efficacy, the rapid evolution of clinical protocols, novel combinations, and expanded anatomical indications necessitates a re-evaluation of the evidence. Methods: A systematic critical review was conducted to evaluate recent literature between year 2024 and year 2026 within MEDLINE, PubMed, and Ovid databases.. Data extraction focused on study design, primary clinical outcomes, safety profiles, and methodological limitations. Evidence was synthesized chronologically and thematically, with all included studies were rigorously classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence (March 2009) to appropriately stratify the current clinical landscape. Results: Fifty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Recent evidence robustly supports the efficacy of microfocused ultrasound for mild-to-moderate facial and cervical laxity. Emerging literature highlights successful integration with injectable biostimulators, dermal fillers, and other energy-based devices. Furthermore, expanded indications, including superficial skin quality improvements and body contouring, show promise. The safety profile remains highly favorable, characterized predominantly by transient erythema and localized edema, though rare reports of significant ocular or neurological complications underscore the importance of anatomical precision. Conclusions: Microfocused ultrasound remains a versatile and highly effective noninvasive modality in aesthetic medicine. While optimal outcomes are consistently observed in lower face and neck lifting, future research must prioritize standardized protocols for novel body indications, long-term follow-up for combination therapies, and rigorous anatomical guidelines to mitigate rare adverse events.
Keywords: ultrasonic therapy; cosmetic techniques; skin aging; rejuvenation; face; dermal fillers
OPEN ACCESS
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
CITE
Lee, K.W.A.; Chan, K.W.L.; Lee, C.H.; Wong, T.H.S. Microfocused Ultrasound in Aesthetic Medicine: An Update and Critical Review. JCRM 2026, 1, 24.
Lee KWA, Chan KWL, Lee CH, Wong THS. Microfocused Ultrasound in Aesthetic Medicine: An Update and Critical Review. JCRM. 2026; 1(2):24.
Lee, Kar Wai Alvin; Chan, Kwin Wah Lisa; Lee, Cheuk Hung; Wong, Tin Hau Sky. 2026. "Microfocused Ultrasound in Aesthetic Medicine: An Update and Critical Review." JCRM 1, no. 2: 24.
Not implemented
SHARE

Article Versions

Export Article

Journal Browser